For US audiences with video
May 15, 2018 | Author: Anonymous | Category: N/A
Short Description
Download For US audiences with video...
Description
Bus Rapid Transit in Rouen, France Using Siemens Optical Guidance System Contents • Community Transit Overview • Historical Summary • Today’s System • Capital and Operating Costs • Optical Guidance and Signaling • Dealing with Narrow Rights of Way • Urban Integration • Rolling Stock • Appendix: Some Details
CREA since 1st January 2010 Communauté de l'Agglomération Rouen Elbeuf Austreberthe
70 municipalities 493,382 inhabitants
La CREA Direction de la communication 14 bis avenue Pasteur CS 50589 - 76006 ROUEN Cedex
Areas of jurisdiction (roughly equivalent to Metropolitan Planning Organization [MPO]) Public transport
Economic development
Solidarity
Cultural and sports activities
(Re-) Employment
Sanitation Water
Grants for small municipali -ties
Waste
Municipal policy Spatial planning
Environment
Tourism
The CREA transport network
Metrobus TEOR (Rouen East-West Transport) Structuring lines Secondary lines TAE lines (Elbeuf transport)
Topography Population density (1999)
Topography
“TEOR” Transport Est-Ouest de Rouen (Rouen East-West Transit) Objectives: Improve access to districts with high population densities Enable access to the congested shopping mall Enable access to frequently used facilities (Government center, University Hospital center, University faculties)
Background of the East-West transport scheme 1994 (December): North-South light rail (with downtown subway) commissioned 1996 (December): Request for Proposals based on performance forecast for east-west light rail line 1997 (December): RFP declared unsuccessful due to high cost of rail option 1997 (December): New RFP for BRT-based system
Background to the East-West transport scheme 1999 (July): Declaration of Public Utility (i.e. Project approved for National-level funding)
2001 (February): Lines T2 and T3 West enter service 2002 (April): Line T1 West enters service 2003 (February): Launch of work in Rouen city center and to the East 2007 (January – December): TEOR gradually enters service eastwards
The lines of the Greater Rouen network Metro: - 1 line 9.4 miles long - 31 stations / 5 municipalities - 28 train sets - Journey speed: 11.9 MPH - Frequency: 2.5 min peak 6 min off-peak - 65,335 boardings / day
TEOR: - 3 lines 18.5 miles long - 53 stations / 8 municipalities - 66 vehicles - Journey speed: 10.9 MPH - Frequency (common sections): 2 min peak hours 3 min off-peak hours - 69,170 boardings / day
The lines of the Greater Rouen network
Bus network: - 8 structuring lines - 22 secondary lines - 11 taxi lines - 28 school lines - 53, 000 journeys / day
College/University
Final TEOR right-of-way
Frequently used facility High density housing Shopping mall
University campus
Gov’t Center
Railway Station Univ. Hospital
Law School
Medical School Shopping Center & Stadium
School of Architecture
Network intermodality Park & Ride Metro / TEOR Interchange Rest area Bike-share area Secure bicycle base Structuring bus lines
Growth of TEOR ridership
Boardings Per Year
Year
Comparison of network lines (2011) Light Rail NETWORK DATA Miles of lines Number of stations Number of vehicles Population served (rounded) Population served per km of line Cost of investment (rounded) Capital cost: Euros/miles OPERATING DATA Cost of operation (annual):
BRT
Bus (structuring lines)
€ €
9.3 31 28 136,000 14,591 490,000,000 € 50,372,568 €
18.5 53 66 90,000 4,860 196,000,000 € 10,782,626 €
62.1 770 81 86,000 1,384 27,000,000 482,804
€ Euros/mile € Euros per passenger-mile €
9,175,680 € 10.43 € 0.62 €
11,500,500 € 7.26 € 0.87 €
35,049,600 5.79 1.34
2.5/min 6/min 11.6 65,335 14,662,000 879,860
2/min 3/min 10.7 69,170 13,748,800 1,584,493
10.8 53,000 11,182,300 6,049,658
Frequency peak hours (common sections) off-peak hours (common sections) Journey speed (MPH) Daily boardings Annual Boardings Miles per year
Comparison of Rail and BRT Costs Capital cost: Euros/miles € 60,000,000 € 50,000,000 € 40,000,000 € 30,000,000 € 20,000,000 € 10,000,000 €-
Capital cost: Euros/miles Light Rail
BRT
Bus
Light BRT (structuring Bus lines) Rail (Line-haul) € 1.60 € 1.40 € 1.20 € 1.00 € 0.80 € 0.60 € 0.40 € 0.20 €-
Operating Cost Euros per passenger-mile
Euros per passenger-mile Light Rail
Light Rail
BRT
BRT
Bus (structuring lines)
Bus
(Line-haul)
Project investment costs (€ million)
Investment cost: € 196 million TEOR investment cost: € 6.5 million/km Light Rail investment cost: € 31.3 million/km
Annual operating costs (€ thousands in 2011)
Operating costs: € 1,624,000
Dealing with Narrow Rights-of-Way Two-way lane length: 4.5 mi.
One-way lane length: 3.7 mi.
Unmarked lane length: 10.2 mi.
Vehicles travel on a two-lane busway with a concrete barrier separating them from general traffic
Vehicles travel on a single (central or lateral), with a crossable concrete strip separating them from general traffic Vehicles circulate with general traffic, but with fully equipped stations
Lane Structure TEOR operation with a single center bus-lane: • Direction of bus travel alternates by sections • Station is always in a reserved lane so stopped bus does not block traffic
TEOR Westbound
TEOR lane
TEOR Eastbound
Lane open to general traffic
Traffic and bus signals
Lane Structure
Dedicated corridor 2 protected lanes (5.9 km) Dedicated corridor 2 reserved lanes (2.4 km) Dedicated corridor 1 protected lane (1.7 km) Dedicated corridor 1 alternating lane (3.5 km) Unmarked lane (9.5 km) Unequipped lane (6.8 km)
Lane Structure Video
Systems • System operation support • Sound systems for stations and buses • Readouts • Priority traffic lights • Special signage • Ticketing system
Signal priority
Transceiver Flashing triangle tower at highest indicates the approaching TEOR has point Oversight by the central control been detected and will (Canteleu) system have all green lights as soon as unloading/loading is confirmed by the driver
Station/Stop (located before the intersection)
Signal and Priority Video
Optical guidance Operation:
The camera reads coded marks on the ground indicating the required route
Man-machine interface
Camera Wheel encoder Torque motor
IT network
Ground marks
A computer analyses the vehicle's position relative to the lane and transmits the required corrections to the steering wheel
Gaps
Horizontal gap
Vertical gap
On average, vertical gaps are 4.25 cm high and horizontal gaps are between 4 and 5 cm wide
Guidance System Video
Station/Stops Design identical to that of tramway stations
Integration with Traffic
Integration with Traffic
Urban integration
Urban integration
Urban integration
Rolling stock
38 Irisbus Crealis Neo vehicles
28 CITELIS vehicles (Diesel)
(37 Diesel + 1 hybride)
- Length: 17.8 m
- Sliding doors - Complete low floor - Escape through the top
- Capacity: 115 places including 40 seated - Optical guidance system - Accessible to persons with reduced mobility and pushchairs - Air-conditioned
Appendix: Some Details • • • •
Financial support Stakeholders Optical guidance alerts Changes in alert rates
Financial support
Subsidies:
€ 82 million
• European Federation (EU) • Central government • Regional council • Department • Municipalities
€ 9.4 million € 29.8 million € 18.6 million € 18.6 million € 5.6 million
(For participation in streetscape work, EDF and utility relocation)
Stakeholders in the project • Phase 1: – Contracting authority: Greater Rouen Urban Authority – Contracting Owner Support (COS): Sogeti – Project Managers: Systra, Thales, Artefac, Attica, Outside, Bailly
• End of phase 1: – – – – –
Contracting authority: Greater Rouen Urban Authority COS: Systra Project Managers / City center: Era, Thales, Territoires Sites et Cités Project Managers / Suburbs: Ingetec, Folius, Outside Project Manager / Systems: Setec
Optical guidance Alert rate per 10,000 landings in 2011
5 categories of alerts • Guidance malfunction: failure of the optical guidance system (OGS): system reset. • Loss of guidance: momentary loss of guidance during operation: system reset.
• Vigilance: markings misread by the OGS. • Operational: alerts caused by operating conditions and the immediate environment of the vehicle during the guidance: system reset.
1.13 per 10,000 0.02 per 10,000 0.01 per 10,000 0.30 per 10,000
• Unclassified 0.07 per 10,000 1.53 in total
Change in alert rate 1 2
3
4
5
1. Out of tolerance 2. Out of service 3. Faulty guidance 4. Loss of guidance 5. False alarm (?)
View more...
Comments